Nibiru / Planēta X

[peleks]

moš ignore šamos, un domājam kapēc radies tāds Kuiper Fall, vai kāds zin kko , tur vesela zemesloda kkur izgaisusi ) vismaz pēc aprēķiniem viņai tur vajadzētu būt ne nu gluži vienā gabalā, bet tāpat massas iztrūkums ir

[asgard]

Pētījums: Pasaules gals tiek atlikts
Nesen publicētajā pētījumā konstatēts, ka maiju kalendārs, iespējams, nebeidzas ar 2012.gadu, vēsta portāls "LiveScience.com".
Tajā kritizēta maiju kalendāra datumu pārnešana mūsdienu kalendārā, norādot uz iespējamo pārrēķināšanos par 50 vai pat 100 gadiem. Tas nozīmē, ka plašu popularitāti ieguvusī 2012.gada apokalipse atliekama vismaz par pāris desmitgadēm, bet maiju cilts vēsturisko notikumu datējums kļūst apšaubāms.
informē tvnet.lv

Maiju kalendārs nebeidzas 2012. gada 21. decembrī, bet vismaz 60 dienas vēlāk
informē 2v.lv

Vai tomēr maiju kalendāram ar nībūrī nav nekāda sakara, un tomēr divpadsmitajā gadā iesim bojā
nedaudz sasmējos!

Ko Gribi teikt ka pasaule neies bojā 2012. gadā un man nāksies atmaksāt visus savus kredītus un līzingus

[gatons]

Nu vismaz Gatons ir "izvilkts" jeb pieslēdzies...tad jau ne velti. te "gaisu tricinam"... Visiem prieks...

Es gan te biju nedaudz atslēdzies - zālīte laba patrāpījās... Izvilkts no kurienes?

[asgard]

Kur tad nu tāds klusums ka jau vairāk kā nedēļu nav neviena apdeita par Nibiru tuvošanos

Atslodzei

[peleks]

ehh, nozondēju netu, nekā jauna nav, izņemot to, ka visi spožo Jupiteru sauc pa nibiru.. tiešam cilvēki negrib uztvert visu kā tas ir, nevar paskatīties kur šobrīd atrodas planētas

[gatons]

Jāpielej nedaudz eļļas (sorri, ja atkārtosies klips)

[peleks]

hehehee tāds video nekas konkrēti nav teikts, te viņa ir milzīga, te plutona izmēros, kura 2012 gadā spīdēs spoži kā saule ak dies!! bet nu tas tā to eļļu bik pašķaidīt

[Tolteks]

turpinājums....

Часть IY


Нибируанский имперский союз разумных рас в Солнечной системе. Свидетельства египетских жрецов.


http://oko-planet.su/phenomen/phenomenscience/page,4,46813-sledy-drevnix-civilizacij-v-krugax-na-polyax-kak.html

[peleks]

turpinājums....

Часть IY


Нибируанский имперский союз разумных рас в Солнечной системе. Свидетельства египетских жрецов.


http://oko-planet.su/phenomen/phenomenscience/page,4,46813-sledy-drevnix-civilizacij-v-krugax-na-polyax-kak.html

iemet linku kur ir mūsdienu speciālisti kko atraduši, nevis ēgiptieši!!
+ beidzot iedo koordinātes!! un pats izlasi visu to ko te rādi + paskaties uz foto, vislabāk man patika tie, kur saule it kā aiziet aiz horizonta un atspulgs arī tik tur neliels fail atspulgs pazūd pirms saule aiziet aiz horizonta, to var redzēt !! kādreiz esi redzējis mēnesi kad viņš atrodas netālu no saules, man draugs vienreiz ar viņu par otro sauli nosauca!! pie kam tas pat nebij vakars, bet dienas vidus.
un visp kad atbildēsi uz jautājumiem??

[zhax]

taatad paskatiijos zetatalk.com majaslapaa un vnk drausmas.... cerams visi mazak vai vairak saprot angliski.... izvilku paris citatus lai var saprast ar kaadu es pat nez, plaanpratibu vai genialitaati ir jaastriidas

NASA has acknowledged that Solar Cycle 24 can result in large solar storms that could be catastrophic for humanity. The Zetas have said that NASA blamed the sun and will not admit that the magnetic disturbances are generated by the planet X. If NASA knows something and has hinted that information, we may deduce that they have calculated the passage of Planet X in those years. ( http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/sc ... rmwarning/ ) I wonder: Absolutely all the information supplied by NASA's solar flares in 2012-2013 and the consequences on earth are lies to hide the real causes?

There are many ways to lie, and NASA uses all these means. One lies by boldface statements that are lies, and NASA does this by openly stating that Planet X is a rumor and not a reality. So given that, why would you even be asking if what they say about the Sun is truth? Because they mix truth with fiction, which is yet another way to lie. Of course there are solar cycles every 10.7 years or so, the last solar maximum occurring in March, 2000. Do the math! At present you should be into the next solar maximum. It should be now. But are you having massive CME's as occurred in the year 2000? No! This photo is of a year 2000 CME, X class. In order to hype the 2012 lie, that nothing will happen until December 21, 2012, NASA moved the date of the solar maximum to 2012, yet another lie. At present, because amateurs have scopes and can view the face of the Sun, NASA cannot simply invent a large CME, but this does not keep them from getting in to the news, prognosticating that the Sun is about to explode into activity, because they are frantic to blame the Sun for the Earth changes. This, despite the fact that this solar cycle is so sleeply, with such a lack of sunspots, that it is almost breaking all records.

When their own images and archives show the presence of Planet X they allowed their archives to be doctored to appear that these anomalies on the SOHO images have been present all along. Inserting erroneous data is a lie too, but they have not stopped at the SOHO doctoring, as doctoring the SOHO background of stars and planets has been a practice since 2003 when the Earth stopped in her orbit. Edit lines, evidence of cutting and pasting, have been present since 2003 also. Silly explanations for evidence of Planet X in the solar system is also not beyond NASA, who will say anything but the truth on this matter. When the Moons of Planet X appeared on solar images, and the issue went viral on the Internet, NASA declared them a "compression artifact". The irrepressible Moon Swirls of Planet X showing up on the SOHO images were claimed as asteroid collisions only recently caught on film by NASA, or so they said. So you are asking if you should discount everything NASA says about the Sun or pending solar storms? With a track record like this, the question should be why any intelligent person believes anything they say! Do you not have a brain? Are you endlessly gullible? Do you lack evidence of their lies? And given that the larger the lie, the more reluctant the liar is to admit their guilt, do you expect NASA to change? We presume the answer is obvious.

I started a blog http://poleshift.ru to inform the Russian peoples about the upcoming poleshift. But I live in Belarus. In documentation about Safe Locations http://www.zetatalk.com/info/tinfx258.htm I have read the following info: "the lands of Belarus will find water sloshing in from the Atlantic during the hour of the shift" But the nearest to the Baltic sea border of Belarus is about 190 km (120 miles) and the whole country is about 300 km (186 miles). That is satisfied to the rule about 160 km (100 miles) distance from the sea. Does general rule incorrect for Belarus? Belarus is flat country like most coastal European countries should 100 miles rule be increased for them?


Though landlocked, the lowlands of Belarus will deal with sloshing from the Atlantic during the hour of the shift for several reasons. Just as with Texas, where the slosh from the Gulf will create a higher pole shift tide there, due to tidal bore over flat land, the countries inland to the east of the Baltic Sea will likewise experience a higher tide. The tide from the North Atlantic will come in from the North Sea, and there be compressed and thus pushed south by the highlands of Norway and Sweden. The Alps to the south create a second funnel side for this tide, which begins to narrow and rise. Of course Denmark and the lowlands of Germany are lost to the tide in any case, but what rushes east against the countries bordering the Baltic Sea is water under greater force due to its height. Finland, western Russia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and even Belarus will experience a pole shift tide that is higher at the start, by 160 feet, than expected elsewhere. The reason for our description of the pole shift tide as 500-600 feet at the coastline is for these reasons, as tidal bore factors are along many coastlines. For the countries east of the Baltic Sea, the tide can be estimated to be close to 700 feet at the coastline.

What this means for those residents in these countries is that they must be slightly higher when inland than the 200 feet at the 100 mile mark. Depending upon terrain, be higher by 200 feet or further inland by 50 miles. Where a tidal bore creates water under a greater push to move, once past the pinch that the highlands of Norway and Sweden create with the Alps to the south, the pole shift tide will dissipate quickly as it can fan out. A significant factor creating concern for those trying to survive the pole shift in Belarus are the rivers that will bring the pole shift tide to its highlands. Tidal bore has a propensity for river bottoms, and rushes up with increasing speed along them as this is an avenue where the water column can seek its own level most readily. If a steady tide can be expected as the pole shift tide rolls inland over land, for those regions dealing with tidal bore there is instead a rush or blast of water under pressure along the river bottoms. This moves the water further inland than would normally flow before it turns back to slosh in the other direction. The 3 rivers carrying this rush of water inland to Belarus means that the cautions about the pole shift tide need to be carried further inland too, for Belarus. Be 400 feet above sea level and 150 miles from the coast, for safety.

My question is about the 7 0f 10 . Zetas have said for many times that the 7 0f10 will happen at the end of 2010, many people are eagerly waiting and paying attention to it to find out whether it will actually happen or not at that time. If it does happens, they will totally believe that Zeta's the prediction is accurate, and take it as a basis for their poleshift plans . I know that although many Chinese people who care about 2012 have read ZetaTalk and Zeta's comments about the future events which have been translated into Chinese. But they are still very skeptic about it, and some of them don't believe it at all, because until now the major events that Zetas have predicted don't happen yet (ig, the 7 of 10). I want to ask Zetas if 7 of 10 is sure to happen at the end of 2010 or it is just another "white lie"? If so, I think many people would stay away from the ZetaTalk rather than get closer to it.

If you are nervous, imagine how Nancy feels! She was there during the 2003 white lie, when Planet X so clearly came inbound as we said it would, right on track according to our coordinates and arriving in the evening sky just where we said it would some 7 years earlier. But it did not pass, as the word "passage" implies, nor did the pole shift happen "shortly after May 15, 2003". We did this deliberately to fool the Bush administration, which had stolen the White House in order declare martial law in the US, to negate all future elections there, to plant the US military in the oil rich Middle East and thus own black gold in the Aftertime. None of this happened, in great part due to our white lie which caused Bush to accelerate his agenda and thus stumble. But what would be the advantage of a failure on the 7 of 10 prediction? As you so amply point out, this would devastate those following and putting faith in the ZetaTalk predictions. There would be no gain. Follow what is going on in Asia, to see evidence of the drama soon to occur.

Where Planet X now? I can feel strange lull in growing of Earth changes. Is something changed? Can Zetas explain why in begin of year 2010 was high level of Earth Changes and seismity level, but now this level unusually quiet. I mean seismoactivity and magnetosphere anomalies.

We have repeatedly referred to a dither that Planet X and the Earth do, whereby they literally bounce off each other and then approach again. During all of this, Planet X continues its outbound course, and the Earth attempts to evade Planet X by scuttling back in her orbit to what will soon be the August position. Add to the mix Venus and the Dark Twin. Imagine a situation where a number of cars are spinning around on ice, out of control and occasionally bashing into each other. Two may bash and spin away from each other. These two may head in the direction of other cars and create multiple car bashes, though the Earth as one of the cars might be unaware of the others. There will be times when, on the rebound, the cars miss each other as they spin and bump into snow drifts or hit a particularly slick spot on the ice. And perhaps the drivers, desperate to gain control, steer the cars somewhat, avoiding collisions. And then there will be those times when all the cars collide at once.

This is a simplistic way of describing the repulsion force, better known as anti-gravity, where large bodies cannot collide with each other. Also, a simplistic way of describing the influence of magnetic fields, where magnets attempt to align end to end or side by side or in opposition to each other and even on occasion at right angles to each other. Mix in the outbound particle flows from the Sun, what humans know as the solar wind, and the returning particle flows that man is unaware or. Add the outbound thrust of Planet X, which has momentum and is punching through the particle flows, a headwind, as it goes outbound, often in a throbbing manner rather than a steady pace. If there seems to be a pause at any point, it is just more disaster heading your way, like spinning cars out of control on a patch of ice, collisions are inevitable!

principa varat ieiet pashi un palasiit... skaidrs kaapec dazhs labs neko nevar pateikt jo arii taja saitaa it kaa kko pasaka bet tomer nekas netiek pateikts....